|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
for criminals? in your opinion, is it lenient or strict?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
For many white collar criminals: They never get busted. In fact, they rule the roost.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
...for starters, when you get a traffic ticket in New York City or other large cities in New York State, you are not allowed a trial by jury, nor are you allowed to be heard by a judge. Instead, you get a "star chamber," of sorts, which is up to 3 "magistrates" who are under specific performance expectation to find "x" number of people guilty. There is no justice. The State of New York simply wants your money, and you are guilty until proven guilty. Turns my stomach.
Last edited by Bob; October 9th, 2009 at 08:52 PM. Reason: corrected a typo |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
^
If you have a traffic violation and fall into the classification of criminal, you have bigger issues than speeding. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's funny. Here in Brazil (São Paulo) if you get a ticket for speeding you have no judges, no jury, no trial, no one to hear what you have to say. You simply pay and that's it. If you want to complain you have to address a letter to the Traffic Engineering Company and wait some months for the reply.
As for the justice system, we have no jury except for murder cases. Everything is written. And for the initial plaintiff's complaint to go to the DESK of the judge it takes sometimes 6-9 months. LOL! You guys got a pretty fast justice system! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
This question is so absurd and vague to the point of being ridiculous. The legal system in NYC is just like in the rest of the state, and within the Federal jurisdiction like it is in all of America.
You can get lucky or unlucky, just like in the legal system of any jurisdiction or country, generally speaking New York is moderately liberal legally speaking, fairly pro-business (not surprisingly, being the financial capital of the world, for now) and very efficient. New York courts are also fairly responsive to changes in public opinion. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Give us some examples. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
while in my state, the mandatory time is 1 1/2 yrs. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
New York has probably the strictest gun possession laws of any state. But mandatory sentencing is a myth. In effect, the 2006 law removed the distinction between illegally carrying a firearm and doing so with criminal intent. But there is usually plea-bargaining in sentencing.
The Plaxico Burress case was reduced from a C to a D felony, resulting in a 20 month sentence. His situation was complicated by the fact that the firearm was discharged. Is gun possession sentencing strictly mandatory in Massachusetts? Note: Back to your original question, the law and legal system are two different things. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
ok, what I'm trying to ask is the criminal legal system and if they give long sentences. I asked this question here before. Some people said it's non lenient and some say it is. How about burglary cases? How long do they usually get? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|